In discrete mathematics and order theory, we study how elements of a set relate to one another in terms of hierarchy and precedence. While equivalence relations group similar elements together, partial orderings allow us to compare and sequence elements systematically, providing the foundation for analyzing complex structured hierarchies.
A relation on a set is a subset of the Cartesian product . We say that is related to , denoted as or , if .
To establish a hierarchical order over a set, we require a relation that behaves predictably with respect to comparison. This leads us to define a partial ordering.
A binary relation on a set is called a partial ordering (or partial order) if it satisfies three axiomatic properties for all :
A set together with a partial ordering relation is called a partially ordered set, or simply a poset, and is denoted as .
Let us prove that is a partial ordering on the set of integers :
Let be the power set of a set . The subset relation is a partial ordering:
Let be the set of positive integers. The "divides" relation (, meaning divides without a remainder, or for some ) is a partial ordering:
In a poset , it is not guaranteed that every pair of elements can be compared. This is why the ordering is termed "partial."
If every single pair of elements in a poset is comparable, the relation is called a total ordering (or linear ordering), and the set is called a totally ordered set (or a chain).
Representing a poset as a standard directed graph (digraph) results in significant visual clutter due to reflexive loops and transitive paths. Hasse diagrams solve this by displaying only the essential order relationships.
To construct a Hasse diagram, we must first define the concept of covering:
In a poset , an element is said to cover (or is an immediate successor of ) if:
We construct a Hasse diagram from the digraph of a partial order relation using the following three steps:
The elements are .
{a, b, c}
/ | \
/ | \
{a, b} {a, c} {b, c}
/ \ / \ / \
/ \ / \ / \
{a} {b} {c}
\ | /
\ | /
\ | /
{ }Let us verify the covering relations for this poset:
24 36
\ /
\ /
12
|
6
/ \
/ \
2 3Certain elements occupy critical positions at the boundaries of a poset. We categorize these as maximal, minimal, greatest, or least elements.
Let be a poset. Suppose and are both greatest elements in .
Referencing our Hasse diagram for under the divides relation:
When studying subsets of a poset, we often need to determine limits or bounds that constrain the subset from above or below.
Let be a poset, and let be a subset.
Note: The bounds and are not required to belong to the subset ; they only need to belong to the parent poset .
Using the poset shown in the Hasse diagram below:
h i
\ /
\ /
g
/ \
/ \
d e f
\ / /
\ / /
b c
\ /
\ /
aLet our subset be .
A poset in which every two-element subset has both a unique least upper bound (, called the join) and a unique greatest lower bound (, called the ) is called a .
A binary relation on a set that is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive.
A mathematical structure consisting of a set paired with a partial ordering relation.
A simplified visual representation of a finite poset that omits self-loops and transitive edges, displaying order relative to vertical height.
Special elements in a poset categorized as maximal, minimal, greatest, or least, depending on their ordering relative to other elements.
Elements that act as upper or lower limits for a subset of a poset; the least upper bound is the supremum, and the greatest lower bound is the infimum.
Test your understanding with 5 questions
Which of the following properties must a binary relation satisfy to be considered a partial ordering?
Consider the poset of positive integers under the divides relation: <X, |>, where X = {2, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36}. Which of the following statements is true?
How is a Hasse diagram constructed from a directed graph of a partial order relation?
What is the primary difference between a maximal element and a greatest element in a poset?
Let S be a set and P(S) be its power set. Under the subset relation, what is the greatest lower bound (GLB) of any two subsets A and B?
6 Modules
6 Modules